Introduction: Why Potato Starch Supply Chains Are Under Strategic Scrutiny

Potato starch occupies a distinctive position within the global starch ecosystem. Unlike maize or tapioca starch, which benefit from geographically diversified feedstock bases, potato starch production remains heavily concentrated in temperate regions with suitable agronomic conditions and established processing infrastructure. This inherent concentration makes the potato starch supply chain structurally more sensitive to trade dynamics, price volatility, and supplier dependency—factors that have become increasingly visible in the Netherlands, one of Europe’s most important starch trading hubs.

As a country that accounts for approximately 6.75% of global potato starch imports, the Netherlands functions not only as a consumption market but also as a redistribution and processing node for downstream food, paper, textile, and chemical industries across Europe. Recent import data from Sep-2024 to Aug-2025 reveal a market undergoing contraction in volume and value, yet simultaneously exhibiting early signs of price stabilization. This divergence underscores the importance of examining potato starch not merely as a commodity ingredient, but as a supply-chain-sensitive material shaped by sourcing concentration, logistics efficiency, and supplier strategy.

 

Global Potato Starch Supply Chain Context

Globally, potato starch is produced predominantly in Europe, with Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, France, and Poland forming the core production belt. This geographic clustering reflects historical investment in potato processing, access to suitable varieties, and integration with co-product streams such as protein and fiber. Outside Europe, potato starch production remains limited, reinforcing the region’s central role in global supply.

From a supply chain perspective, potato starch differs fundamentally from maize starch. Maize benefits from globally distributed cultivation and deep futures markets that stabilize pricing and availability. Potato starch, by contrast, is exposed to seasonality, crop yield variability, and regional trade policies, making import-dependent markets especially sensitive to shifts in supplier behavior.

This structural reality frames the Netherlands’ recent import performance, where changes in volume, price, and supplier composition are not isolated events but reflections of deeper supply chain recalibration.

 

Netherlands Import Market Overview: Contraction with Underlying Complexity

In the Last Twelve Months (Sep-2024 – Aug-2025), the Netherlands imported US$85.77 million worth of potato starch (HS Code 110813), representing a 10.2% year-on-year decline in value. Import volumes fell to 107.24 Ktons, down 7.9%, while average proxy prices decreased by 2.5% to approximately US$799.78 per ton.

This contraction contrasts sharply with the Netherlands’ longer-term trend of relatively stable potato starch inflows, indicating that short-term pressures—rather than structural demand collapse—are shaping the market. Importantly, the decline is not purely volume-driven; it reflects a combination of reduced purchasing intensity, supplier realignment, and price negotiations in a more competitive environment.

For supply chain stakeholders, this matters because declining volumes combined with price pressure typically signal a buyer-driven market phase, where importers exert greater leverage over suppliers—at least temporarily.

 

Short-Term Price Rebound: Early Signal of Supply Tightening

Despite the overall LTM decline, a closer look at the most recent periods reveals a more nuanced dynamic. During Jan-2025 to Aug-2025, average proxy prices rose 11.8% year-on-year, reaching approximately US$760 per ton, even as volumes imported between Mar-2025 and Aug-2025 dropped sharply by 20.4%.

This divergence between price and volume suggests that the supply chain is entering a transitional phase. Rather than pushing volume aggressively, suppliers may be prioritizing margin preservation, particularly in response to higher production costs, energy prices, or raw potato input variability. Alternatively, it may indicate localized supply constraints, where reduced availability tightens the market despite lower overall demand.

For importers and downstream users, this price behavior acts as an early warning indicator. While the broader market remains soft, the ability to secure low-cost material may diminish if suppliers continue to restrict volumes to stabilize pricing.

 

Supplier Concentration: Germany’s Dominance and Structural Risk

The most defining feature of the Netherlands potato starch supply chain is its high concentration. In Jan-2025 – Aug-2025, Germany accounted for 55.2% of import value and 48.9% of import volume, increasing its value share by 6.8 percentage points year-on-year. In absolute terms, German exports to the Netherlands reached US$24.6 million, reinforcing Germany’s position as the cornerstone supplier.

From a supply chain risk perspective, this level of dependence creates vulnerability. Any disruption—whether from crop yield issues, regulatory changes, energy cost spikes, or logistics bottlenecks—within Germany could transmit rapidly into the Dutch market. While Germany’s scale and reliability mitigate some risks, concentration above the 50% threshold limits flexibility for buyers during periods of tight supply.

Belgium and Denmark occupy the second and third positions, with 12.0% and 10.5% value shares respectively, but neither approaches the scale necessary to offset a major German supply shock.

 

Emerging Suppliers: Strategic Diversification Signals

Amid this concentration, the rapid growth of smaller suppliers is particularly noteworthy. Czechia’s import value surged by 188.8% during the LTM period, contributing US$1.57 million to market growth, while the UK’s import volume expanded by 86.2%.

Although these suppliers remain small in absolute terms, their growth rates signal a strategic shift. Importers appear increasingly willing to test alternative sourcing routes, either to hedge against German dominance or to access differentiated pricing structures. For Czech and UK suppliers, this growth reflects successful penetration into a tightly held market—often a precursor to longer-term supply chain realignment.

From a supplier strategy standpoint, these emerging players introduce competitive pressure that may gradually reshape contract negotiations, especially if they demonstrate reliability and consistent quality.

 

Price Dispersion Among Suppliers: Cost Optimization Opportunities

Price differentials among major suppliers further illuminate the Netherlands’ sourcing landscape. In Jan-2025 – Aug-2025, Belgium offered the lowest average proxy price at approximately US$561.8 per ton, while Denmark supplied at a premium of US$1,082.1 per ton—nearly 1.9 times higher.

Germany occupied a mid-range pricing position at US$824.7 per ton, balancing cost competitiveness with scale and reliability. While the price gap does not reach extreme “barbell” levels, it is significant enough to influence sourcing strategies, particularly for price-sensitive applications.

For importers, this dispersion presents tactical opportunities to optimize procurement by blending suppliers or renegotiating contracts based on comparative benchmarks. For suppliers, it reinforces the importance of clearly articulating value propositions—whether through consistency, functional performance, or logistical advantages—beyond price alone.

 

Declining Suppliers: Belgium and France Lose Ground

The supply chain contraction is not evenly distributed. Belgium’s import value fell 18.5%, with volumes down 34.3% in the LTM period, while France experienced an even sharper contraction, with import value declining 68.5% and volumes dropping 51.2%.

These declines suggest a loss of competitiveness rather than purely cyclical weakness. Factors may include higher production costs, reduced output, or strategic redirection toward other markets. For Dutch importers historically reliant on these suppliers, the decline necessitates reassessment of sourcing strategies and reinforces the importance of maintaining diversified supplier portfolios.

Conversely, the retreat of these suppliers creates space for both dominant and emerging players to consolidate share, intensifying competition within a smaller overall market.

 

Netherlands Within the Global Native Potato Starch Landscape

The Netherlands’ import dynamics must also be viewed against the backdrop of the broader native potato starch market, which remains integral to food, paper, textile, and chemical industries. While global market size data indicates steady growth potential through 2033–2034, this expansion is uneven across regions and applications.

Within the wider food starch market—projected to grow at a 2.5% CAGR from 2026 to 2036—potato starch competes with maize-based and modified starches that benefit from cost efficiency and supply flexibility. As a result, potato starch increasingly competes on functional performance, clean-label compatibility, and application-specific advantages, rather than price alone.

This competitive positioning amplifies the importance of a resilient supply chain. Any disruption or cost escalation can quickly erode potato starch’s competitiveness relative to alternative starch sources.

 

Supply Chain Implications for Food and Industrial Buyers

For food and beverage manufacturers, the Netherlands’ potato starch supply chain signals a need for proactive procurement planning. The combination of supplier concentration, emerging price rebounds, and declining secondary suppliers increases exposure to volatility.

Industrial users in paper, textile, and chemical sectors—often operating on tighter margins—may face difficult trade-offs between price optimization and supply security. In this context, long-term contracts, diversified sourcing, and closer supplier collaboration are becoming essential risk-management tools rather than optional strategies.

 

Conclusion: Navigating a Tighter, More Strategic Potato Starch Supply Chain

The Netherlands’ potato starch import market is entering a phase defined by lower volumes, stabilizing prices, and heightened supplier concentration. While overall demand has softened in the short term, underlying supply chain signals point toward tightening availability and strategic repositioning by suppliers.

Germany’s dominance underscores efficiency and reliability but introduces concentration risk, while the rapid rise of Czech and UK suppliers reflects early diversification efforts by importers. Price dispersion across suppliers highlights opportunities for cost optimization but also underscores the importance of understanding value beyond unit price.

Looking ahead, successful navigation of the potato starch supply chain will depend on data-driven sourcing decisions, supplier diversification, and early engagement with emerging producers. In a market where structural constraints are unavoidable, strategic supply chain management—not just pricing—will define competitive advantage.

 

Sources